An Open Letter to Congress on “New” National Parks

Update February 17, 2026: It’s been SIX YEARS since the passage of the Great Outdoor Act, and about 4 NPS units are being floated as potential National Park #64, and nothing has changed. If anything, NPS is in worse shape now than it was when I first wrote this letter in 2019. The deferred maintenance is up to 23 BILLION DOLLARS, and that’s with the Great Outdoor Act money. NPS had its staff cut by 24%, and it looks like it’s going to lose a third of its already barebones budget in the 2026 federal budget. Then we add in the fact that the current nominee for NPS director is an executive from Delaware North, a company that spent 15 years in a lawsuit with NPS over Yosemite trademarks and demanded $50 million.

Stop using our parks to score political points and start actually protecting them. If you actually cared about our parks, you’d increase their funding so they could be properly managed.

Before we even talk about adding a new National Park, you need to be able to answer the following questions:

• Is the park infrastructure ready for an immediate 20-50% increade in visitors?
• Does it have the parking capacity to handle the additional traffic during the busy season?
• Does it have the bathroom capacity to handle that increase?
• Does it have the staffing to handle those increases? How do current staffing levels compare to visitation?
• Is there a plan to address these issues? Is additional funding going to be made available to address these issues?
• What is the status of the backlog maintenance in said park, and what is the timeline to get that backlog maintenance completed?
• Will NPS have to pull resources from other nearby NPS units? How will that affect those smaller unit operations?

Update December 21, 2020: A year has passed since White Sands became a National Park. In the next couple of days, we will be getting National Park #63. Yet again, I should be excited, but I’m not. This year, it’s a combination of frustration and dread. I want to be excited, but unlike our politicians, I’m not blind. I see the repairs the parks need, and while I am happy that Congress finally passed the Great American Outdoors Act. Good job, it only took you 30 years to pass the damn thing. Wonder how long it will take to fund the rest of the deferred maintenance, along with money to improve the infrastructure in the existing parks to better handle crowds. But I guess I should be thankful for a new national park. So here’s your sarcastic pat on the back for a job well done.

Dear Members of Congress,

I should be really excited and celebrating the creation of the 62nd National Park. But, I can’t celebrate when I’m frustrated that once again, politicians put gaining short-term political gains with their constituents over long-term sustainability of our National Parks.

Congress saw fit to pass the 738 BILLION DOLLAR National Defense Authorization Act that, in part, elevated White Sands National Monument to National Park status, but couldn’t be bothered to include 3.1 million dollars to cover the current deferred maintenance in White Sands.

I really wish I could celebrate the creation of a new National Park, but I can’t. I refuse to bury my head in the proverbial sand and ignore the issue facing our national parks.

White Sands is going to be yet another park that sees a huge increase in tourism without the infrastructure to handle it. If Indiana Dunes is any example, is White Sands ready for 30% more visitors? Can it handle an extra 180,000 visitors a year? Does it have parking for that many additional visitors? Does it have the staffing to patrol and manage the extra crowds? Do the bathrooms have the capacity to handle that increase?

You, the members of Congress, don’t appear to be asking these questions, but I can guarantee the National Park Service is. They are reviewing their budget and staffing and considering how to cover White Sands’ increased needs while minimizing service cuts in the other NPS units in the region.  

I’m tired and frustrated that members of Congress are perfectly willing to give lip service to protecting and funding our parks. But they can’t be bothered to take REAL action to ensure our parks are properly maintained and protected.  In February 2019, 30 members of the Senate were happy to co-sponsor a token bill (Restore Our Parks Act) about park funding. But nothing has happened beyond the nice public announcement that the bill has been introduced.

If you were willing to take real action to protect our parks, you would be actively working on passing bills that include funding for the following:

• the 12 billion dollars in backlog maintenance (now up to 23 billion in 2024)

• Staffing issues (Parks not having enough staff, high turnover, and underpaid)

• Existing parks need improvements, such as
  • More Bathrooms
  • Public Transportation Systems
  • Improved interpretation exhibits or builds actual visitor centers

It is starting to feel like OUR elected officials only see the National Parks as a way to score political points with constituents and garner good press, without considering the costs (both monetary and human) to our national parks. 

It is critical that our National Parks be properly maintained and adequately staffed to protect the remarkable geology, spectacular scenery, and outstanding recreation experiences for future generations. If we don’t, we can say goodbye to the economic impact of the parks and vibrant park gateway communities that rely on the National Parks crowds.  

It is estimated that National Park visitors spent 20.2 billion dollars and provided 268,000 jobs in park gateway communities in 2018.  If we allow the parks to continue to be run with inadequate infrastructure and barely managed crowds, America’s best idea will be destroyed by the visitors who come to enjoy them.  

Something has to give, and I hate to think that Dr. Gil Lusk, a former Park Superintendent of Glacier and Big Bend, is right and we need to start closing national parks to save the National Park System.

So I wanted to ask all the members of Congress, are the National Parks an issue that actually matters to yo,u or are they just talking points that you bring out once in a while when you need some good press?

Sincerely,

Jennifer Melroy, A Frustrated National Lover

P.S. The token $133 million “increase” of the NPS’s budget this year doesn’t cut it. That will barely keep up with additional maintenance needs that have developed or the increase in repair costs of the further delayed maintenance.

If you are reading this and you are as frustrated as I am over the National Park Service’s funding woes, please share your concerns with your elected officials. Click here to find the contact information for your elected officials.

Please call, email, post on their Facebook Page, or anything to let them know that you are tired of our national parks just being talking points. Feel free to share this letter with them or write your own.

If we can’t get Congress to act, here are my top 5 UNPOPULAR suggestions for funding our parks outside of a Congressional funding bill.

Pin it to share it: